I would say "dependency analysis" rather than just diagram since your point is the alternative linguistic claims, rather than just how it looks.
like elements in the stack --> that are stored in stack memory
XXwhen ---> Combining preferences across all experiments, we derive....
as Paul said, able to model cross-linguistic ambiguity resolution preferences by appeal....
try putting the "Following Roark 04..." and "formalized as beam-search" sentences earlier, like right before the "We tested..." sentence. That way there is just one place where you are explaining about the parser. You can leave the "These findings..." at the end because that is a forward-looking statement about who else would care.
1 comment:
I would say "dependency analysis" rather than just diagram since your point is the alternative linguistic claims, rather than just how it looks.
like elements in the stack --> that are stored in stack memory
XXwhen --->
Combining preferences across all experiments, we derive....
as Paul said,
able to model cross-linguistic ambiguity resolution preferences by appeal....
try putting the "Following Roark 04..." and "formalized as beam-search" sentences earlier, like right before the "We tested..." sentence. That way there is just one place where you are explaining about the parser. You can leave the "These findings..." at the end because that is a forward-looking statement about who else would care.
Post a Comment